« Posts under Tutorial

Photoshop Weight Loss Video Tutorial

Here’s an interesting weight loss tutorial in Photoshop. This is an older video, but it demonstrates the effects very well.

Use Photoshop to virtually put someone on a diet in Photoshop! Music: Kevin MacLeod

Simple tilt-shift corrections in Lightroom

In this video tutorial, I show you the basics on using lens corrections within Lightroom to apply simple tilt and shift corrections to an image. As noted in the video, it is better to do this in camera if you have or can afford a tilt-shift lens. If you can’t, then this is a simple method that allows you to make these kinds of corrections in post.

Creating the Illusion of Shallow Depth of Field

In this, my first video, I show you how to change the depth of field of an image to reduce background distractions. The video is a little rough since it is my first. I would be very interested in hearing your feedback on this. Thanks for taking the time to watch it.

A couple of things I forgot to mention in the video. When using the brush tool to get up close to the edges as you are creating the mask, use a medium soft brush, the blending is better and looks more realistic. Getting the edges to look right takes some practice. Also, when using the clone stamp tool to remove the haloing around the subjects, as long as you are painting on the image (not the mask), you don’t need to worry about cloning over the edges of the subjects. The mask is taking care of this.

Exposure Fusion in Photomatix – A Reference

If you are looking for a good way combine multiple exposures to achieve dynamic range in a natural or realistic maner, you should give the exposure fusion method a try. Although you can achieve realistic looking images using the tone mapping options, exposure fusion will give very good results with a lot less work on your part. The exception is that if you have moving objects in your scene, you might want to use the tone mapping option to take advantage of the deghosting feature. Additionally, for really high dynamic range images, tone mapping will be the better option as exposure fusion doesn’t handle really high dynamic range very well – i.e. it won’t look natural.

The first options you have within exposure fusion allows you to select how the exposure fusion should work or which method you want to use. There are five options.

Average will average the exposures together based on the available information in the exposures. You do not have any options available to you with this method and I find it rare that you would ever want to use it. After all, when would you want a straight average of anything?

Highlights & Shadows – Auto looks at the highlights and shadow information in each of the exposures and blends these exposures together to achieve a natural and realistic look. Again, there are no adjustments that you can make with this method. Although the results look pretty good, I would rather have some control over the outcome rather than letting the computer decide what the final image should look like. So again, it is rare that I would use this method.

Highlights & Shadows – 2 Images allows you to select which two images of your set to use then applies the “auto” method to blend these images together for the final result. There are no adjustments available other than selecting which two images to use. This method may get you the result you’re looking for, but if you want to tweak your image, this is not the method to use.

Highlights & Shadows – Intensive applies a rather aggressive blending or fusing method that often causes banding or an unnatural look in clouds. Luckily, this option gives us three sliders for some control of the final look. Of the three sliders, Radius has the most effect on the image because it sets the weighting amount to use when fusing the images together. The higher the number the less banding and haloing you will see, but it takes significantly longer to process the image. If you use this method, and you should try it, adjust the radius first to dail in the overall look of your image, then adjust the local contrast using the Strength slider. Negative numbers on the strength slider will flatten your image by removing contrast and positive numbers will punch up the contrast and increase depth. Lastly adjust Color Saturation to your desired amount. Just remember, too much of a good thing is not good – make small adjustments and maybe don’t adjust the color at all within photomatix. Save the color adjustments for photoshop, lightroom, or other photo editing software used in your post processing work flow.

Highlights & Shadows – Adjust applies the same blending or fusing of the auto method, but allows you to make a number of adjustments to the final image. This is the default method for exposure fusion and is the method you will end up using for more than 90% of your images for which you use exposure fusion.

At left you see the adjustment panel for the adjust method. I will go through each of these controls in the order in which you should use them (which is not the order – top to bottom – they are presented). Although I am suggesting a certain order for using these controls which I hope will make sense, you can use them in any order you choose. So let’s get started.

Blending Point – this controls the weighting given to the under exposed images versus the over exposed images. If you want the fusion to use more information from the underexposed images, move this slider to the left or into the negative numbers. Likewise, move the slider to the right or into the positive numbers if you want to include more information from the over exposed images. Another way to think of this control is to think of it as an exposure control – negative numbers will under expose where positive numbers will over expose your image.

Accentuation – this is the same as the Strength slider in the intensive method. It controls local contrast. Moving the slider to the left into negative numbers will remove contrast and flatten the look of your image. Moving the slider to the right into the positive numbers will punch up the contrast and increase depth.

Shadows – this controls the brightness of the shadow areas without affecting the highlights. If the shadow areas in your image are too dark, move this slider to the right to brighten up the shadows. Again, remember a little adjustment goes a long ways. Don’t over do it.

White Clip – Think of this as a fine tune adjustment for contrast in the highlight regions of your image. Increasing this slider – moving it to the right – will increase contrast in the image but does it at the expense of detail in the highlights. You will lose detail in the highlight regions when increasing the white clip slider.

Black Clip – works the same way as the white clip, just does it’s work in the shadow regions of your image. Increasing this slider – moving it to the right – will increase contrast in the image at the expense of detail in the shadow regions, i.e. you will lose detail in the shadows when increasing this slider.

Midtone – controls the overall brightness of the image but also affects contrast. Moving the slider to the left reduces brightness in the image and increases contrast. Moving the slider to the right will brighten the image but reduce overall contrast. To dial in just the right look may require multiple adjustments to Accentuation, White & Black Clip, and Midtone sliders. Just make small adjustments as you dial in the right look.

Color Saturation – does just what the name suggests, it adjusts the saturation of the color in the image. This is a global control and as such you may want to consider making color adjustments in photoshop, lightroom, or other photo editing software that is designed specifically to work with color. I have at times increased this slider to add just a little more color to my image, but I will always fine tune the color in other photo editing software.

360 degree image – removes the seam from a 360 degree panorama. This is another option that is probably better left to another application that is designed specifically for processing panoramas.

Presets – allows you to select and/or save presets for use. If you have dialed in a specific look that you like, save it as a preset. Then on the next image all you need to do is select your preset and your done!

Again, remember that when you click on the process button, you are not done. Your image is now at that RAW stage and additional post processing is needed to finish up and give the image it’s final look.

That’s all! Hope you find this reference of use.

Optimal Hyperfocal Distance

What exactly does that mean? I thought that once I set the hyperfocal distance everything from half that distance to infinity would be in good focus, am I wrong? No, that would be correct. It would be in “good” focus. Now what if you need everything from point A (up close and personal) to point B (a good distance away) to be in “sharp” focus? This is where the optimal hyperfocal distance comes into play. By the way, it’s not really an optimal “hyperfocal distance” as much as it is an optimal “f/stop” for the determined mid distance. Huh?

Ok, I see I need to explain this a bit. I came across some information (on Ken Rockwell’s site) that provided a different formula to calculate an optimal distance for a given f/stop. By using this formula, you will basically obtain “sharp” focus from point A to point B (with a few disclaimers). The disclaimers are mine, not Ken’s. I used the formula to calculate a new “Optimal Hyperfocal Distance” chart, and have been testing this all day. The results were amazing!

Here’s how it works:
1. Set the focal length you want to use on your lens.
2. With your camera on auto-focus, focus on the nearest point you want to be in sharp focus. Now look at the focal distance on the lens.
3. With the camera still on auto-focus, focus on the farthest point you want to be in sharp focus. Now look at the focal distance on the lens.
4. Switch the camera to manual focus, and dial the focus ring on the lens to exactly half way between the near focal point (step 2) and the far focal point (step 3) and estimate what this distance is. For example, if my near point read 8 ft, and the far point read 20 ft, I would set the focus ring to approximately 12-14 ft.
5. Now I go to the chart and scan across the line of distances for the focal length I set in step 1. When I find the distance that closely matches that determined in step 4, I will look to the top of the column for the f/stop to use.
6. Dial in the f/stop, frame the shot, and take it.

Ok, time for the disclaimers. If for example your near point is 20 ft, and your far point is 120 ft, then the dialed in focal point would be roughly 70 ft on my lens. Well half of 70 ft is 35 ft which is greater than our near point of 20 ft. So some adjustments are needed and some sacrifice of focal quality either at the near or far point will be necessary.

I got the best results from this when using the widest angle focal length available on my lens, and being reasonable on the near focal point.

Here’s a new table to download which works as is for 35mm film or full frame digital cameras. For those of you with the DX (1.6 crop) sensors, you will need to set your focal length on your lens, then multiply that number by 1.6 to get the focal length to use in the chart. Since the formula is rather complex, I’m not going to present it here.

Download the chart:
Optimal Hyperfocal Distance (250)

This is one to play around with and see what kind of results you get. Just be sure to always use the auto-focus to determine the near and far focal distances or the results won’t be what you would like them to be. As a note of information, when I did this with my 28-300mm lens set at 28mm, the near distance was about 8 ft, and focusing in on an object that was more than 500 ft distant gave me a reading of about 21 ft. Pretty weird, but I went with it anyway and the result was amazing. When setting the lens to 50mm and using the same focal points the auto-focus read 22 ft for the near point and 120 ft for the far point. Camera position didn’t change, focal points didn’t change. Just the focal length of the lens changed and this caused the auto-focus to read differently. Using these numbers I had a distance of 71 ft which meant my near point would not be in sharp focus – which was definitely the case when I took the shot.

Play around with it and see what you get! I would be interested to know how this works for you. Enjoy.

———
UPDATE:

Here’s another way to determine the distance to get the same results. With your lens on manual focus, look at the markings on the focus ring. If you want everything from say three feet to infinity in sharp focus, put your thumbs at the edges of the marks and turn the focus ring until the alignment dot is exactly half way between your fingers (or between the 3ft and infinity marks). Estimate what this distance is in relation to the distance markings and use it in the chart to look up what f/stop to use. For example, on my 28-300mm lens, half way between 3ft and infinity is about 20ft on the focus ring markings. Using 20ft with the lens at 28mm the chart indicates an f/stop between f/8 and f/11 and based on the distances it looks like f/10 would be the best choice. Works really well and I think this is a whole lot easier (and I’m all about the easy way to do it)!

BTW, using this method and this chart (downloadable above) is far sharper than using the standard hyperfocal distance charts.

Hyperfocal Distance – revisited

Ok, this is being revisited because it can be such a difficult thing to understand. I wrote a short article on this a few months ago as part of the depth of field series, but even so, another look might be of use.

So what is Hyperfocal distance and why would I care? Basically, hyperfocal distance is an optical property that is based on the sensor size, the focal length, and the aperture. This is defined as the distance at which when focused, everything from half this distance to infinity will be in acceptably sharp focus. There is a mathematical formula to calculate it which is basically H = FL^2 / (fs * CoC) + FL. Looks rather cryptic doesn’t it?

H = Hyperfocus Distance in milimeters
FL = Focal Length
FL^2 = Focal Length Squared
fs = Aperture
CoC = is based on the size of the sensor. This value will be 0.03 for film and full frame digital sensors, and will be 0.02 for DX (1.6) crop sensors (which is the vast majority of digital SLR’s).

The formula gives the results in milimeters. So to convert to meters, multiply by 0.001 or divide by 1000. To convert milimeters into feet, multiply by 0.00328125.

Based on this information, with my full frame digital camera set to a focal length of 28mm and an aperture of f/16, the hyperfocal distance would be 5.5 feet. So everything from 2.75 feet to infinity should be in focus when I take the shot.

Ok, so I understand what it is, but why do I care? There are several situations where having this knowledge comes in handy. The one that most people think of is when shooting landscapes, and yes, that is a very good application of using the hyperfocal distance. For example, if I come upon a scene that I want everything from two feet to infinity in good focus, I would set the aperture for f/22 (or maybe f/32) because this helps to give more sharpness throughout (depends on the lens and the sweet spot – more on this in the next article), set the lens to 28mm or less, manually focus my lens to four feet – which I got from the calculation (2.8 feet for f/32), mount the camera on the tripod and dial in the correct shutter speed for the exposure desired.

Another application is that of a journalist/photographer that needs to get the shot amidst a lot of action – i.e. other photographers trying to get the same shot. You could set the camera to f/8, 17mm, focus at four feet, dial in the correct shutter speed and fire away knowing that your resultant shots will be in focus. Ever hear the phrase “f8 and be there!” Setting your camera in this manner is what the phrase refers to.

There are many other possible applications where this technique allows you to get the shot when focusing on a subject would be difficult or otherwise impossible. The following shot of Sprague Lake in Rocky Mountain National Park was taken using the hyperfocal distance. Focusing through the view finder would have been very difficult with this shot as the camera was being held only inches off the water.

Sprague Lake - Rocky Mountain National Park

Sprague Lake - Rocky Mountain National Park

So, to make things a little easier for you (I’m all about easy), I’ve created a spreadsheet in Microsoft Excel that gives the hyperfocal distance for all the major f/stops, and the most common focal lengths. There is a version for full frame cameras, and another for DX crop cameras. Feel free to download them – they are free. If you change the CoC number, then entire table will recalculate with the new value. Likewise, if you change the aperture value or the focal length, the table will recalculate. This has been setup to print at the size of a credit card so you can have it laminated and carry it with you. Laminating it makes it durable and waterproof.

Here’s the downloads:

This first link is for the full frame sensors or 35mm film cameras
Hyperfocal Distance Chart CoC 0.03 (210)

This second link is for the DX crop sensors
Hyperfocal Distance Chart CoC 0.02 (259)

That’s all for this entry!